Australian University Research Rankings 2010
(added 1st Feb 2011)C1 = physical, chemical and earth sciences
C2 = humanities and creative arts
C3 = engineering and environmental sciences
C4 = social, behavioural and economic sciences
C5 = mathematical, information and computing sciences
C6 = biological and biotechnological sciences
C7 = biomedical and clinical health sciences
C8= public and allied health sciences
Australian Research Council (ARC)
|
2010 ARWU SHJT Shanghai Jiao Tong University China Academic Ranking of World universities - Australian universities ranking:
|
2010 THE Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2010 Australian University Rankings
|
2010 QS Top World 200 Ranking Times Australian University Rankings
|
2009 THES-QS Top World 200 Ranking Times Higher Education Supplement University Rankings
|
THES World Univeristy Rankings 2008
The Australian National University has pipped Stanford and Michigan, and comfortably beaten the best universities of France, Germany and China, to grab 16th place (holding onto to its 2007 ranking) in this year's Times Higher Education world university rankings.
Unfortunately the other 6 Australian Universities ranked inside the World’s Top 100 lost ground on their ranking from last year.
2008 THES-QS Top World 200 Ranking Times Higher Education Supplement University Rankings
|
2008 SHJT Academic Ranking of World universities - Australian universities ranking:
|
Australian University Rankings 2007.
2007 THES-QS Top World 200 Ranking Times Higher Education Supplement University Rankings
|
2007 Australian University Rankings from the Melbourne Institute
|
2006 Australian University Rankings in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University World Rankings
Shanghai Jiao Tong University's Institute of Higher Education has developed a reputation for ranking the world universities. The 2006 rankings feature a number of Australian universitites within the top 500 as follows:National Rank | University | Regional Rank (Asia Pacific) | World Rank |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Australian National University | 3 | 54 |
2 | University of Melbourne | 7 | 78 |
3-5 | University of Queensland | 10-19 | 102-150 |
3-5 | University of Sydney | 10-19 | 102-150 |
3-5 | University of Western Australia | 10-19 | 102-150 |
6 | University of New South Wales | 20-24 | 151-200 |
7-9 | Macquarie University | 25-40 | 201-300 |
7-9 | Monash University | 25-40 | 201-300 |
7-9 | University of Adelaide | 25-40 | 201-300 |
10-11 | University of Newcastle (Australia) | 41-63 | 301-400 |
12-16 | Flinders University | 64-92 | 401-500 |
12-16 | James Cook University | 64-92 | 401-500 |
12-16 | Murdoch University | 64-92 | 401-500 |
12-16 | University of New England (Australia) | 64-92 | 401-500 |
12-16 | University of Tasmania | 64-92 | 401-500 |
2006 Australian University Rankings
This table shows the 2006 rankings of Australian universities based on a comparative analysis of a number of general elements relating to university performance. This does not measure or compare the individual learning areas within the university.
|
Australian School and Discipline Rankings
Click here for the latest school and discpline rankings:
|
2005 Melbourne Institute International Standing of Australian Universities
This table shows the 2005 standardised rankings from the quantitative survey conducted by the Melbourne Institute into the international standing of Australian universities. The Institute examined a number of variables to determine this standardised ranking, including the international standing of staff, graduate programs, undergrad intake, undergrad programs, resources, and the views of Deans and CEOs.
Note: The Melbourne Institute is operated by the University of Melbourne
|
University of Melbourne ranked number 19 in the world 2005
Times Higher Education Rankings
The Times Higher Education Supplement world university Top 20. Last year's rankings are in brackets.
1 (1) Harvard University US
2 (3) Massachusetts Institute of Technology US
3 (6) Cambridge University UK
4 (5) Oxford University UK
5 (7) Stanford University US
6 (2) University of California, Berkeley US
7 (8) Yale University US
8 (4) California Institute of Technology US
9 (9) Princeton University US
10 (27) Ecole Polytechnique France
11- (52) Duke University US
11- (11) London School of Economics UK
13 (14) Imperial College London UK
14 (23) Cornell University US
15 (17) Beijing University China
16 (12) Tokyo University Japan
17- (20) University ofCalifornia, San Francisco US
17- (13) University of Chicago US
19 (22) Melbourne University Australia
20 (19) Columbia University US
Source: Times Higher Education Supplement
Teaching Performance Rankings August 2005
This table shows the teaching standards published in the Australian newspaper. An explanation of the scaling method follows the table:
|
The scaling method used in preparing this league table has five components:
1) CEQ (Course experience questionnaire) generic skills: 17.91% weighting
2) CEQ good teaching: 18.5%
3) CEQ overall satisfaction: 18.9%
4) Students in full-time employment after they graduate: 11.48%
5) Those that go on to full-time study: 10.29%
6) Drop-out or attrition rates: 10.65%
7) Student progress or pass rates: 12.26%
2004 Times Higher Education Supplement Australian Rankings
This list shows the international ranking of Australian universities that have been included in the top 100 universities as determined by the Times Higher Education Supplement
- 16 Australian National University
- 22 University of Melbourne
- 33 Monash University
- 36 University of New South Wales
- 40 University of Sydney
- 49 University of Queensland
2004 Melbourne Institute International Standing of Australian Universities
This table shows the standardised rankings from the quantitative survey conducted by the Melbourne Institute into the international standing of Australian universities. The Institute examined a number of variables to determine this standardised ranking, including the international standing of staff, graduate programs, undergrad intake, undergrad programs, resources, and the views of Deans and CEOs.
Note: The Melbourne Institute is operated by the University of Melbourne
|
Any prospective student should be aware that the ratings of Australian universities might produce a list of what is regarded as Australian top universities, but this does not mean that these universities have what the student requires over all areas of study. Many of the Australian universities have reputations in various areas that are far better than the reputations that the ranked or elite level universities have for those particular areas. Two examples would be RMIT University's architecture studies and La Trobe University's nursing studies. There are also many other examples in areas such as computing, international studies, public relations, and business. The prospective student must therefore think carefully about how any university offers exactly what the student wants instead of just relying on an Australian university ranking system alone.
There is no official ranking of Australian universities as exists in some other countries. All universities used to be grouped in terms of quality but that practice was stopped because the government believed it placed limitations on the lower ranking and benefited the top ranking Australian universities, The Department of Education, Science and Training DEST teaching performance rankings Australia are not really a ranking of the universities as they relate to the experience of the students. The Australian university rankings that do exist are therefore based on independent evaluations that use different critera and approach the task from different perspectives. One of the first to undertake a rating was Asiaweek, although the best Australian universities were included with the Asian rankings in the survey they conducted.
Asiaweek's Australian top ranking universities
Asiaweek magazine spent three years compiling the first and only regional listing of Asia's best universities, They claim that they have become an authority on the subject. Asiaweek maintains an extensive databank on everything from faculty qualifications to research output to student-per-teacher ratios to data on Internet access of 114 leading multi-disciplinary institutions and science and technology schools across Asia. Unfortunately for the credibility of Asiaweek's ranking system there have been some major Asian universities withdraw from the survery. Most notable of these is the withdrawal of the prestigious University of Tokyo. Along with this many of the Chinese universities have decided not to particpate.
All of the Australian universities took part in the survey so it is still possible to get an idea about what Asiaweek thought about the top Australian universities. The only problem with the withdrawal of so many top profile Asian insitutions from the survey is that the position on the list is not necessarily correct. However, the position of each institution relative to other Australian universities can still show what Asiaweek thought of the Australian rankings.
Asiaweek's ranking of Australian universities
The original Asiaweek 1999 survey included a number of Australian universities. These are presented in the order that they appear in the Asianweek top 100 (with original Asiaweek Asian ranking position indicated).
- 8 University of New South Wales
- 10 University of Melbourne
- 13 Australian National University
- 15 University of Sydney
- 19 University of Queensland
- 25 University of Western Australia
- 34 University of Adelaide
- 46 Monash University
- 51 Macquarie University
- 59 University of Wollongong
Multi-Disciplinary | Science and Technology | ||
| Name | Asian Ranking | Name |
8 | Australian National University | 22 | Curtin University of Technology |
9 | University of Melbourne | 25 | Queensland University of Technology |
10 | University of New South Wales | 26 | University of Technology |
13 | University of Sydney | 28 | RMIT University |
23 | University of Western Australia | 38 | University of South Australia |
25 | University of Queensland | ||
26 | University of Adelaide | ||
30 | Monash University | ||
45 | University of Wollongong | ||
56 | Maquarie University |
Australian top universities
Another way of looking at the Australian university ratings is to examine some of the groupings that have formed since the removal of the government controlled grouping system. The most important of these is the 'Group of Eight' which consists of all the previous 'Group 1' Universities (the highest ranking) along with a couple of others that have improved their performance and quality over recent years. The group of eight is regarded as the group of top Australian universities and each of these universities is able to attract resources, students and personnel because of this reputation. The group of eight consists of (not in ranking order):- The University of Adelaide
- The Australian National University
- The University of Melbourne
- Monash University
- The University of New South Wales
- The University of Queensland
- The University of Sydney
- The University of Western Australia
Australian MBA Rankings
Financial Times MBA World Top 100 2000
Two Australian entrants on the Financial Times MBA 2000 world rankings were:
Melbourne Business School (University of Melbourne) - 57
Australian Graduate School of Management - 65
Financial Times MBA World Top 100 2003
These same two entrants were on the Financial Times MBA 2003 world rankings:
Melbourne Business School (University of Melbourne) - 64 (3 year average 67)
Australian Graduate School of Management - 69 (3 year average 55)
The selection criteria for this ranking comprised three broad dimensions: purchasing power in the marketplace, diversity of experience, and research qualities. The Financial Times rankings are regarded as the most comprehensive head-to-head comparison among business schools worldwide.
Financial Times MBA World Top 100 2004
QUT's Brisbane Graduate School of Business is a new entrant in the Financial Times Top 100 for 2004:
Australian Graduate School of Management - 53 (3 year average 63)
Melbourne Business School (University of Melbourne) - 72 (3 year average 73)
Brisbane Graduate School of Management QUT - 82
Asiaweek Asia's best MBA schools 2000
IMPORTANT NOTE: The following schools did not participate in this survey:
Australia Asia Management Centre (The Australian National University)
Australian Graduate School of Management AGSM (University of New South Wales and University of Sydney)
W O R L D C L A S S
BEST IN REPUTATION
No Australian winner
BEST FULL-TIME MBA IN ASIA
Melbourne Business School No:1 of 3
BEST PART-TIME MBA IN ASIA
Melbourne Business School No: 1 of 3
BEST EXECUTIVE MBA IN ASIA
No Australian winner
BEST DISTANCE MBA IN ASIA
Curtin University of Technology No: 2 of 3
Brisbane Graduate School of Business No: 3 of 3.
Asia's Best MBA Schools By Reputation
======================================
Asian Rating
- 4 Melbourne Business School
- 15 Macquarie Graduate School of Management
- 16 Monash Mount Eliza Business School
- 26 School of Management (RMIT University)
- 27 Graduate School of Business (University of Technology Sydney)
- 30 Brisbane Graduate School of Business (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
- 31 Graduate School of Management (University of Adelaide)
- 33 Graduate School of Business (Curtin University of Technology)
- 40 International Graduate School of Management (University of South
- Australia)
Five Australian MBA schools appear on the Economist 2002 rankings
School Rank (out of 100)
42 Macquarie Graduate School of Management
70 Australian Graduate School of Management
75 Mt Eliza Business School
89 Melbourne Business School University of Melbourne
91 Monash University Graduate School of Business
1 comments :
Very helpful post, thanks a lot. Completing thesis writing is an uphill task. Fortunately, there is the website for you to discover here which offers highly specialised writers online in Australia. You can use them like many other students have, to produce the best thesis writing while carefully taking care of your specified requirements. No more sleepless nights for you!
Post a Comment